Other Links:
|
ecently Creationists, and
particularly Intelligent Design advocates, have taken to arguing
that information in the genome is evidence for special creation
by an intelligent designer (generally assumed to be God), and
against evolution. A common Creationist tactic is to ask: "do
evolutionists have any examples of mutations or evolutionary
processes which have led to an increase in genetic information?"
But do they really know what they are talking about?
It is easy to make false, scientific-sounding claims when discussing complex ideas such as Information Theory. Readers should be suspicious of any writing on the subject that:
- Claims to provide a measure for meaning;
- Claims to be based on both Classical (Shannon) and Algorithmic (Chaitin-Kolmogorov) Information Theory (or neither);
- Claims to distinguish between random and non-random data;
- Proposes new theorems, principles, or laws without thoroughly demonstrating their validity;
- Infers causality from correlation;
- Makes unsubstantiated claims about the probability of an event; or
- Otherwise lacks mathematical rigor.
This series of articles provides a brief overview of Classical Information Theory, Algorithmic Information Theory, and current Creationist arguments about information theory by Gitt, Spetner, and Dembski. Problems with the various Creationist arguments are explained. The complete mathematical background for Classical and Algorithmic Information Theory is not provided here; it is quite detailed and on-line references are provided for those who want to read more.
[Shannon information] [Algorithmic information] [Gitt information] [Spetner information] [Dembski information]
| Home Page | Browse | Search | Feedback | Links |
| The FAQ | Must-Read Files | Index | Creationism | Evolution | Age of the Earth | Flood Geology | Catastrophism | Debates |